I can perhaps help a little. True to Tanizaki style (helped by the presence of an interviewer who keeps nodding in agreement), his words flow, making perfect sense without necessarily building tight grammatical constructions: 'The first time I met Akutagawa-kun: he kindly paid a visit to me. I think it was in Taisho 6 [1917]. He and others like Akagi Ketahei [赤木桁平; actually Akagi Kouhei, but Tanizaki is calling him Ketahei here, somewhat jocularly], Eguchi Kan [江口渙] - they just came around with nobody to introduce them or anything. By then he had written [such iconic works as] ‘Hana’ and ‘Imogayu’. He looked pretty much the same as he did at the time of his death, although he later did get more neurotic - with his sharp eyes getting even more so. Overall, he had the look of an exceptionally brilliant man. I wonder what he would be like now were he alive - my guess is that he would have pursued his academic interests, establishing himself as a scholar, and perhaps writing literary works in his spare time - that would have suited him best, I do really think so.'
肉声が聴けるなんて、貴重だ…
1965年に亡くなられた。谷崎潤一郎氏の肉声初めて聞きまし
大正6年に生きてた人の声…文化遺産に片足突っ込んでる
すげぇ
凄い上品な話し方でちょっとイメージと違いビックリ
すごいですね、貴重です
すごいです。ありがとうございます。
貴重な資料おおきに！
この人から春琴抄が生まれたのか
すごい、大変貴重な音声ありがとうございます。学者で生活を立ててサブで作家、確かに彼はそのような暮らしの時期がありましたね。その方が安定していて少しは精神的に余裕が持てたのかもしれませんが、体力的に厳しかったとか。人の育成にも関わってほしかったなあ、と惜しい気持ちです。
芥川賞ってのがあるのだから📕本が好き❤️あるいは本を書く📝人間は自殺や犯罪をしても良いという事だと思います。あるいはそれらを許している。
目が鋭くなってきたのは発狂するか薬物やりながら執筆していたのでは無いでしょうか？
病的な谷崎潤一郎先生から病的って！
耽美派
I wish there were English subtitles. My Japanese is not good enough to keep up with him.
I can perhaps help a little. True to Tanizaki style (helped by the presence of an interviewer who keeps nodding in agreement), his words flow, making perfect sense without necessarily building tight grammatical constructions:
'The first time I met Akutagawa-kun: he kindly paid a visit to me. I think it was in Taisho 6 [1917]. He and others like Akagi Ketahei [赤木桁平; actually Akagi Kouhei, but Tanizaki is calling him Ketahei here, somewhat jocularly], Eguchi Kan [江口渙] - they just came around with nobody to introduce them or anything.
By then he had written [such iconic works as] ‘Hana’ and ‘Imogayu’. He looked pretty much the same as he did at the time of his death, although he later did get more neurotic - with his sharp eyes getting even more so.
Overall, he had the look of an exceptionally brilliant man. I wonder what he would be like now were he alive - my guess is that he would have pursued his academic interests, establishing himself as a scholar, and perhaps writing literary works in his spare time - that would have suited him best, I do really think so.'
Q Higuchi Thank you. It helps.
マジ マンジ
芥川龍之介に比べたら志賀直哉とか谷崎とか、ぜんぜん大したことない作家。
先に生まれて威張ってたけどな。
文学に比べるとかいう概念はないと思うよ
そりゃあ知名度は差があるけど、それだけで作品や人の価値は決められるものじゃない
志賀直哉先生の達意の名文を大した事ないの？
冗談だろ？冗談じゃなきゃ、そんな無知な事は言わない筈だ。君のは芥川しか読んだことの無い奴の感想だな。言い切るってのは恐ろしいことだよ
志賀や谷崎が大したことのない作家？一体何をもってそう思ったのか。それを説明せずして論を述べると云うのは恐ろしい事だよ